Housing plans approved despite M5 noise concerns

PLANS to build 71 new homes have been given the thumbs up despite one councillor saying the noise from the M5 was “insufferable”.

Wychavon District Council’s planning committee approved the plans to develop the site on land to the north of Walk Mill Drive, Wychbold, near Droitwich.

Twelve members voted in favour of the plans, put forward by Taylor Wimpey Midlands, with two abstentions.

The development would be next to another housing development proposed by Persimmon Homes for 61 homes on land off Crown Lane which has already been approved by planners.

Fourteen residents have objected to the plans including Peter Hood, of Walk Mill Drive, who said he was worried about flooding.

“Ever since the quarry was flooded there have been problems with flooding,” he said. “It’s been noted by Taylor Wimpey that water barriers will be fitted to all houses on the estate. This is not an eco-friendly measure. It’s an admission the drainage will not cope.”

Councillor Margaret Rowley said she was concerned about the development being so close to the M5.

But councillor Judy Pearce said despite the noise from the M5 being “insufferable”, she would reluctantly support the application.

“The noise on the back of this site is awful,” she said. “The motorway is well above the level of the gardens and the noise will leak around the top.

“The housing mix is not ideal but it’s considerably better than it was and considerably better than the mix of housing on the estate next door which was passed some time ago. I really can’t think how we’re going to refuse this site.”

Comments(5)

i-cycle says...
7:17pm Sat 9 Mar 13

This is a crazy situation brought about by a Government hell bent on letting the developers do more or less what they want.

The local councils and especially Wychavon are all but defenceless in being able to resist. To do so will almost inevitably involve them in long legal battles which they can no longer afford due to massive Government imposed cuts.

The Government and particularly Eric Pickles trumpets its "Localism' agenda suggesting they are giving local people greater say in development in there areas, The reality is far different.

The developers and landowners are being given free reign to slap in planning applications where they want rather than where it makes best sense to develop new housing.

The only hope is that with all the applications being submitted the demand for housing is so low that the least desirable ones will fail to be built.

skychip says...
7:25pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Well said I-cycle. With more housing comes the need for better road infrastructure, more schools and health services.

chrism says...
1:29am Sun 10 Mar 13

Is WEN so short of stories that it's now recycling them? This appears to be exactly the same story as one published several days ago http://www.worcester
news.co.uk/news/1026
7846.Homes_approved_
despite____insuffera
ble____M5_noise/ - I did wonder what had happened to my comment on that (much the same as what i-cycle says here).

old misery says...
7:29pm Sun 10 Mar 13

lets be honest if all local residents in all areas had their way no further houses would be built anywhere. The question I always ask the NIMBY is where would YOU now be living if all past generations stopped development in their locality. As for noise from M5 surely thats the new owners problem

i-cycle says...
8:29pm Sun 10 Mar 13

Old Misery

You make a valid point about NIMBYism and new housing having to built somewhere. We certainly need a lot more houses if we are to meet the increased demand and prices are to become more affordable.

However there are some places where its better to develop than others.

Develop in inappropriate places and you add additional burdens on schools, sewage systems, public transport and other vital infrastructure.

We the tax payers will ultimately pick up the bill.

Currently the Government is increasingly opening up the decision where to build to developers and landowners. These have no interest at all in considering anything other than their immediate short term profits.

The way the Government is weakening the planning system and forcing through massive cuts on staffing levels means it is increasingly difficult for local Councils to control development in a way that ensures such development is appropriate and sustainable.

The Government 'sells' its strategies on a Localism agenda. The reality is they have declared 'open season' for developers to increasingly build where they see fit and not local communities through their democratically elected representatives and paid professionals determine.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree